Two combatants are selected, such as Wolverine vs. Batman.  Then posters chime in about who would win in a fight and why.  After a number of comments, someone can change the combatants.

Of course, combatants don't have to be fighters in real life, although the competition is about who would win in a real fight.

The Topic is:

Rugby Players vs Hockey Players

Having drank with both sorts... its a close one but I am gong to side with the guys that don't where pads.

Rugby players.

hockey players; canadians are badass when they are sliding around on the ice with metal blades on their shoes.

I second Hockey Players. I am Canadian. Our women hockey players would totally tear apart the other nations.

Yeah i agree. When canadians fight, they do it on the ice ... with deadly efficiency. Look at this canadian execution:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1weVp4S8IFc

and thats why you dont fuck with canadians if you like when your heads attached to your neck. In other news, kim jung il is the new canadian prime minister! YAY!!

I go with Rugby players- that game is *rough*! Honestly...

Hockey players have built in blades on their feet and heavy hard pads to block out the Rugby player's hits. Rugby players have next to no AC. Hockey players also have wooden scythes.

If they didn't have any sports equipment, then rugby players. With the blades, hockey players would win by far.

Who would win:

Grant the gunslinging space cowboy or CL the Z-Tube Slinging Space Sherrif?

Present you cases ...

Grant the gunslinging space cowboy, because GM.

Grant, too many Z's and S's in the other guys name, he'd stumble all over his words.

I'd go with the ChaosLord, because c'mon.  Lord of Chaos.

Much as I hate to admit it, I think the delusional ferret has a bit up on our present Sean Connery impersonator.

ChaosLord, of course.  Come one, do we really need to even hash that one out?  Now, Dragon vs ChaosLord, that one could be really difficult...