atminn:
I want to learn to run the rpg Strike! Tactical Combat and Heedless Adventure before bringing it to the table for a local live group. Its system provides rich tactical combat akin to a very streamlined 4e D&D (which I enjoy but fights took so dang long), and out-of-combat narrative mechanics akin to Mouse Guard/Burning Wheel (and PbtA more broadly).
Would there be interest for such a game here on RPoL?
I'm somewhat interested, since I like to support 4th Edition D&D where I can. I still run that edition primarily and I like to think I have some answers to the issue of long fights, ones that rely on the fiction of the game, rather than any rule changes.
I can't say I know anything about the Mouse Guard/Burning Wheel mechanics specifically, but I'm familiar with PbtA.
atminn:
(Strike! was originally called Sacred BBQ because it was testing what happens if some 'sacred cows' of traditional rpgs were set aside, an effort I admire).
Ooh, like what?
atminn:
I've run a single live session, but I want to feel out the system to understand its nuance and depth. To be clear, I'm not committing to a long-term campaign.
That suits me.
atminn:
Best practices for tactical turn-based gameplay via pbp?
What are best practices for running turn-based grid+mini tactical games via pbp? How do you handle maps and prevent pacing from grinding to a halt while waiting on a stricter turn order?
Personally, I've given up on using an actual grid for PBP, preferring to rely on a "status" block that gives the basics of everyone involved. I've done that for a few years, and it works really well, though I don't know that anyone could just jump right into the concept. It has taken me some time to sort out. It also relies on the text-based nature of pbp gaming and wouldn't necessarily work at a table.
I only sweat turn order a little, and even if the opposition is interespersed with the PCs, it's pretty easy for them all to end up in two groups. At that point, I generally find (as I think most people do) that the players can then act in whatever order they want.
I urge players not to wait, but sometimes people want to know what others will do before they act. When it's the players' turn, I generally give every player 24 hours from the last post (mine or another players) in which to take their actions. If they can't manage it within that time, I have them delay, or I just skip their turn. I will adjust the opposition or challenge on the fly if someone appears to have stopped playing. Even if there's just a delay, I'll try to adjust to that depending on the lay of the land. For instance, if there are numerous enemies, and one of five players disappears I'll "set aside" about 20% of the opposition, describing them as locked in battle with the character whose player is missing.
atminn:
To be honest, I'm not sure how to effectively run turn-based grid+minis games via pbp. The last time I ran/played in a pbp with turn-based grid-based tactical combat was way back in 2010 or so with 4e on the WotC forums. We used text-based maps back then and it worked ok, but it'd put load on the GM to update the map after every turn. I'm curious if others have advice for better (or more attractive) ways to keep track of positioning and pacing of turns in pbp format.
Have people had success using text maps, Google Drawings, Roll20 or something?
If one is set on using a map, Google Docs seems like the best option to me, because players can at least move the markers around as appropriate, rather than relying on the DM for everything.